- CME/CE Activities
- Angiotensin-Directed Therapies for Stable IHD
This CME/CE activity is provided by PRIME Education, Inc. (PRIME®) and is accredited for a multi-disciplinary audience of health care practitioners. This activity is supported by contract number HHSA290201200021I from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. User data collected through this activity will reside on PRIME's educational portal for use by AHRQ.
AHRQ's Comparative Effectiveness Research on Angiotensin-Directed Therapies for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Applying the Results in Practice
- Program Overview
- Faculty Biographies
- Accreditation Statements
- Post-Test & Evaluation
Credit for this CME/CE activity has expired.
You can still access the program, but will not receive a certificate.
Activity DescriptionStable ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a condition of advanced atherosclerosis in which affected individuals may be asymptomatic or may experience debilitating symptoms, including angina and diminished activity tolerance. Stable IHD significantly increases the risks of nonfatal and fatal cardiovascular events. Considerable evidence from clinical trials has demonstrated that standard medical treatments - including antiplatelet therapy, statins, beta-blockers, and vasodilators - partially reduce risks and/or symptoms in patients with stable IHD. The evidence is less clear about the effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs), especially in patients with stable IHD who have no history of heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction. For this population a key clinical question is whether, compared with standard medical therapy alone, the addition of an ACEI or ARB is beneficial and safe. Another question involves the benefits and harms of combined regimens of these angiotensin-directed therapies. These questions are central to a systematic research review that was commissioned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and published in 2009. The findings and clinical applications of the AHRQ review are presented in this educational activity.
At the conclusion of this activity, the participant should be able to:
- Summarize the comparative effectiveness and safety of adding an ACEI or an ARB to standard therapy versus standard therapy alone
- Compare the benefits and harms of ACEI-ARB combined therapy plus standard therapy versus an ACEI or an ARB plus standard therapy
- Identify characteristics and clinical conditions of patients who might benefit from adding an ACEI, an ARB, or ACEI-ARB combined therapy to standard therapy
- Apply the systematic review findings to make appropriate patient-centered treatment decisions and to counsel patients about individualized treatment options
This CME activity is designed to meet the educational needs of physicians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, nurses, case managers, medical assistants, health education specialists.
Method of Participation
To receive a certificate for this activity, you should:
- Complete the learner assessment pretest
- View the entire activity online (Hardware/Software Requirements: Broadband & Flash Player or HTML5 browser)
- Complete an online evaluation & post-test
- Print your certificate online
The estimated time to complete this activity, including review of the materials, is 1.0 hour.
Term of Approval
June 30, 2011 through June 29, 2013. Original release date: June 30, 2011.
Acknowledgement of Support
There is no fee for this CME/CE activity. This activity is sponsored by PRIME Education, Inc (PRIME®) and funded under contract HHSA290201200021I from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Faculty Biographies and Disclosures
C Michael White PharmD, FCP, FCCP
Professor and Head, School of Pharmacy,
Gary L Schaer, MD
Professor of Medicine
Director, Cardiac Catheterization Lab
Rush University Medical Center
Carolyn LePage, PhD, ARNP
Barry University School of Nursing
Miami Shores, FL
Heidi Wynn Maloni, PhD, ANP-BC, CNRN, MSCN
National Clinical Nursing Director
Department of Neurology
Multiple Sclerosis Center of Excellence, East Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Trinity Nursing Program School of Professional Studies, Trinity Washington University
Clinical Preceptor and Instructor
Advanced Practice Programs, The Catholic University of America School of Nursing
Wanda F Carter, MPH, CHES
Community Collaboration Manager
Adjunct Professor, Axia College (U of Phoenix) Health Care Administration Program
Adjunct Professor, Ashford University Health Care Administration Program
PHPS Alumnus, CDC Scientific Education and Professional Development Program Office
Donna M Chiefari, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, RPh, FASHP
Adjunct Faculty & Preceptor
Albany College of Pharmacy
Joyce M Knestrick, PhD, CRNP, FAANP
Online Program Director
Associate Professor Georgetown University
Family Nurse Practitioner at Wheeling Health Right
Kathleen A Jarvis, MS, RN, CCM
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Sherman Podolsky, MD
Department of Emergency Medicine
Albert Einstein Medical Center
This program is no longer accredited.
|Faculty Name ||Advisory Board||Consultant||Grants / Research||Salary / Contractual||Supported Promotional Education||Stock / Shareholder||Other Financial Support|
|C Michael White PharmD, FCP, FCCP
|Gary L Schaer, MD
|Carolyn LePage, PhD, ARNP
|Heidi Wynn Maloni, PhD, ANP-BC, CNRN, MSCN
|Wanda F Carter, MPH, CHES
|Donna M Chiefari, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, RPh, FASHP
|Joyce M Knestrick, PhD, CRNP, FAANP
|Kathleen A Jarvis, MS, RN, CCM
|Sherman Podolsky, MD
|Chris R Prostko, PhD|
Scientific Program Director
|Lynn Goldenberg, RN, BSN|
Director of Accreditation & Compliance
PRIME Education Inc (PRIME®) endorses the standards of the ACCME, as well as those of the AANP, ANCC and ACPE, that require everyone in a position to control the content of a CME/CE activity to disclose all financial relationships with commercial interests that are related to the content of the CME/CE activity. CME/CE activities must be balanced, independent of commercial bias and promote improvements or quality in healthcare. All recommendations involving clinical medicine must be based on evidence accepted within the medical profession.
A conflict of interest is created when individuals in a position to control the content of CME/CE have a relevant financial relationship with a commercial interest which therefore may bias his/her opinion and teaching. This may include receiving a salary, royalty, intellectual property rights, consulting fee, honoraria, stocks or other financial benefits.
PRIME® willidentify, review and resolve all conflicts of interest that speakers, authors, course directors, planners, peer reviewers, or relevant staff disclose prior to an educational activity being delivered to learners. Disclosure of a relationship is not intended to suggest or condone bias in any presentation but is made to provide participants with information that might be of potential importance to their evaluation of a presentation. Disclosure information for speakers, authors, course directors, planners, peer reviewers, and/or relevant staff are provided with this activity.
Presentations that provide information in whole or in part related to non FDA approved uses of drugs and/or devices will disclose the unlabeled indications or the investigational nature of their proposed uses to the audience. Participants should refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications and warnings. Participants should verify all information and data before treating patients or employing any therapies prescribed in this educational activity. The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the presenting faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of PRIME®, the ACCME, AANP, ACPE, ANCC and other relevant accreditation bodies.
Content validation methods are consistently utilized by PRIME® to ensure that all program content is evidence-based, fair-balanced, and developed with scientific rigor and integrity. All clinical recommendations are based on evidence accepted within the medical profession. All scientific research referred to, reported or used to support a clinical recommendation conforms to accepted standards of experimental design, data collection and analysis. In addition to review of content by course directors and expert faculty, content is also validated through independent peer reviewers selected for their expertise in the content area, as well as their experience in the intended audience. All peer reviewers, planners, course directors, faculty and relevant staff utilized by PRIME® complete disclosures which are related to their role in the educational activity.
PRIME®is committed to providing access to our CME programs for individuals with disabilities as identified in Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act for all web-based programs. This website is 508 compliant.
To play the video below, your device must support HTML5 video (ex: iPad, Android, Chrome) or have Adobe Flash Player installed. Closed captioning is available by clicking the "CC" button in the top right of the video player.
Post-Test & Evaluation
Credit for this program has expired.
If you already completed this program and need to reprint your certificate(s), login here.
Clinician & Consumer Summaries on ACEIs and ARBs
Download these free summaries for your reference and/or patient handouts. You may also order bulk copies free of charge from the AHRQ Publication Clearinghouse below.